A Simple Active and Reactive Power Control for Applications of Single-Phase Electric Springs

ABSTRACT

Aiming at effective power management in microgrids with high penetration of renewable energy sources (RESs), the paper proposes a simple power control for the so-called second-generation, single-phase electric springs (ES-2), that overcomes the shortcomings of the existing ES control methods. By the proposed control, the unpredictable power generated from RESs is divided into two parts, i.e. the one absorbed by the ES-2 that still varies and the other injected into the grid that turns to be controllable, by a simple and accurate signal manipulation that works both at steady-state and during RES transients. It is believed that such a control is suitable for the distributed power generation, especially at domestic homes.  In the paper, the proposed control is supported by a theoretical background. Its effectiveness is at first validated by simulations and then by experiments. To this purpose, a typical RES application is considered, and an experimental setup is arranged, built up around an ES-2 implementing the proposed control. Testing of the setup is carried out in three steps and proves not only the smooth operation of the ES-2 itself, but also its capability in running the application properly.

 

KEYWORDS

  1. Electric spring
  2. Smart load
  3. Microgrids
  4. Power control
  5. Grid connected
  6. Distributed generation.

 

SOFTWARE: MATLAB/SIMULINK

 

CIRCUIT DIAGRAM

Fig. 1. Topology of ES-2 and associated circuitry.

 

EXPECTED SIMULATION RESULTS

Fig. 2 Simulation waveforms under different variations of the input active power. (a) From 1.6kW to 1.1kW and then back to 1.6kW @ VG=230V. (b) From 8kW to 2kW and then back to 8kW @ VG=200V. (c) From 8kW to 4kW and then to 2kW @ VG=200V..

Fig. 3. Transient ES-2 responses to a change of the line voltage with Pinref=1.5kW. (a) From 240V to 210V. (b) From 210V to 240V

Fig. 4. Simulation waveforms before and after grid distortion. (a) Results of PLL. (b) Results of active and reactive power of ES system.

 

CONCLUSION

The input active and reactive power control is proposed for the purpose of practical application of ES-2 in this paper. An overall review and analysis have been done on the existing control strategies such as δ control and RCD control, revealing that the essences of the controls on ES-2 are to control the input active power and reactive power. If being equipped together with the distributed generation from RESs, the ES-2 can manage the fluctuated power and make sure the controllable power to grid, which means that the ES-2 is able to deal with the active power captured by MPPT algorithm. Simulations have been done on the steady and transient analysis and also under the grid anomalies, validating the effectiveness of the proposed control. Three steps have been set in the experiments to verify the three typical situations and namely the active power generated by the GCC from RESs are, 1) more than; 2) less than; 3) the same as the load demand. Tested results have validated the proposed control.

 

REFERENCES

  • Cheng and Y. Zhu, “The state of the art of wind energy conversion systems and technologies: Areview,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 88, pp. 332–347, Dec. 2014.
  • Sotoodeh and R. D. Miller, “Design and implementation of an 11-level inverter with FACTS capability for distributed energy systems,” IEEE J. Emerging Sel. Topics Power Electron., vol.2, no. 1, pp. 87–96, Mar. 2014.
  • Wang, and D. N. Truong, “Stability enhancement of a power system with a PMSG-based and a DFIG-based offshore wind farm using a SVC With an adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 2799–2807, Jul. 2013.
  • Zhang, X. Wu and X. Yuan, “A simplified branch and bound approach for model predictive control of multilevel cascaded H-bridge STATCOM,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 7634–7644, Oct. 2017.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *