This paper presents two typologies of three-phase semi controlled rectifiers suitable for open-end ac power sources. The rectifiers are composed by a combination of two-level three phase bridges (controlled, semi controlled or uncontrolled), and three single-phase floating capacitor h-bridges (controlled). These typologies generate two powered dc-links, each one belonging to a three-phase bridge. They present a reduced number of controlled power switches if compared to other open-end configurations of similar complexity found in the literature.
S V P WM
It is also proposed a space-vector pulse width modulation (S V P WM) approach and a method of floating capacitor voltage control dedicated to the typologies, with an equivalent approach based on the level-shifted P WM (LS-P WM). The proposed S V P WM solving method is based on a redundant state selection (RS S) technique, which allows the floating capacitors voltage regulation. On the other hand, the LS-P WM solving method is based on the neutral voltage selection, which is shown to be equivalent to the S V P WM RS S technique seen from the control system. Simulation results are shown to validate proposed typologies, as well as the S V-P WM and LS-P WM techniques, and the control strategy. Experimental results are shown to demonstrate proposed configurations feasibility.
Fig. 1: Proposed configurations with open-end power source and cascaded floating h-bridges. (a) Configuration 1, where converter A is a three-phase diode bridge. (b) Configuration 2, where converters A and B have semi-controlled legs.
EXPECTED SIMULATION RESULTS
Fig. 2: Simulation graphics for the conventional configuration 0. (a) Currents i k. (b) Voltages v k, v r k and v 0 s 0. (c) Mean voltages v k, v r k and v 0 s 0.
Fig. 3: Currents i k from simulation results for both proposed configurations with the LS-P WM. (a) For configuration 1. (b) For configuration 2.
Fig. 4: Voltages v 1, v r 1 and v 0 b 0 a from simulation results for both proposed configurations. (a) For configuration 1 with S V-P WM. (b) For configuration 1 with LS-P WM. (c) For configuration 2 with S V-P WM. (d) For configuration 2 with LS-P WM.
Fig. 5: Mean voltages v 1, v r 1 and v 0 b 0 a for both proposed configurations. (a) For configuration 1 with S V-P WM. (b) For configuration 1 with LS-P WM. (c) For configuration 2 with S V-P WM. (d) For configuration 2 with LS-P WM.
Fig. 6: DC capacitors voltages v C ck from simulation results for both proposed configurations with the LS-P WM. (a) For configuration 1. (b) For configuration 2.
Fig. 7: Pole voltages v a 1 0 a, vb 10 b, v c p 10 c 1 and v c n 10 c 1 for both proposed configurations. (a) For configuration 1 with S V-P WM. (b) For configuration 1 with LS-P WM. (c) For configuration 2 with S V-P WM. (d) For configuration 2 with LS-P WM.
In this paper, two configurations of unidirectional rectifiers were proposed. They were based on the cascaded connection of two three-phase bridges with three floating capacitor h bridges (one per-phase), which was allowed by the open-end configuration of the three-phase power source. The voltage regulation of the floating capacitor h-bridges was realized by two proposed PWM solving techniques. The first was applied to the SV-PWM, where methods for redundancy selection and state switching minimization were also proposed. The second was proposed for the LS-PWM as an alternative to the SVPWM.
L S P WM
In this case, the floating capacitors voltage regulation was based in solving the P WM for appropriately selected neutral voltage references. Simulation results were provided to supply evidence that proposed typologies are viable and that proposed S V-P WM redundancy selection technique is effective within the control system. It was also shown that the control based on the LS-P WM was effective and equivalent to the S V-P WM. It could be concluded that the proposed configurations could present lower current TH D and voltage W TH D with fixed switching frequency, as well as lower semiconductor losses with matched current TH D, if compared to the conventional three-phase I B GT rectifier bridge. Simulation results also provided to show the feasibility of proposed typologies and control strategy.
 S. Debnath, J. Qin, B. Bahrani, M. Saeedifard, and P. Barbosa, “Operation, control, and applications of the modular multilevel converter: A review,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 37–53, Jan 2015.
 R. A. Krishna and L. P. Suresh, “A brief review on multi level inverter topologies,” in 2016 International Conference on Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT), March 2016, pp. 1–6.
 F. Z. Peng, W. Qian, and D. Cao, “Recent advances in multilevel converter inverter topologies and applications,” in Power Electronics Conference (IPEC), 2010 International, June 2010, pp. 492–501.
 J. Rodriguez, J.-S. Lai, and F. Z. Peng, “Multilevel inverters: a survey of topologies, controls, and applications,” Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 724–738, Aug 2002.
 M. Diaz, R. Cardenas, M. Espinoza, F. Rojas, A. Mora, J. C. Clare, and P. Wheeler, “Control of wind energy conversion systems based on the modular multilevel matrix converter,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 8799–8810, Nov 2017.