**ABSTRACT**

This paper presents a transformerless static synchronous compensator (STATCOM) system based on multilevel H-bridge converter with star configuration. This proposed control methods devote themselves not only to the current loop control but also to the dc capacitor voltage control. With regards to the current loop control, a nonlinear controller based on the passivity-based control (PBC) theory is used in this cascaded structure STATCOM for the first time. As to the dc capacitor voltage control, overall voltage control is realized by adopting a proportional resonant controller. Clustered balancing control is obtained by using an active disturbances rejection controller. Individual balancing control is achieved by shifting the modulation wave vertically which can be easily implemented in a field-programmable gate array. Two actual H-bridge cascaded STATCOMs rated at 10 kV 2 MVA are constructed and a series of verification tests are executed. The experimental results prove that H-bridge cascaded STATCOM with the proposed control methods has excellent dynamic performance and strong robustness. The dc capacitor voltage can be maintained at the given value effectively.

** ****KEYWORDS****:**

Active disturbances rejection controller (ADRC), H-bridge cascaded, passivity-based control (PBC), proportional resonant (PR) controller, shifting modulation wave, static synchronous compensator (STATCOM).

** ****SOFTWARE****:** MATLAB/SIMULINK

** ****CONTROL BLOCK DIAGRAM:**

Fig. 1. Control block diagram for the 10 kV 2 MVA H-bridge cascaded STATCOM.

** **

Fig. 2. Block diagram of PBC.

**EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS:**

Fig. 3. Experimental results verify the effect of PBC in steady-state process. (a) Ch1: reactive current; Ch2: compensating current; Ch3: residual current of grid. (b) Ch1: reactive current; Ch2: compensating current; Ch3: residual current of grid.

**
**

Fig. 4. Experimental results show the dynamic performance of STATCOM in the dynamic process. Ch1: reactive current; Ch2: compensating current; Ch3: residual current of grid.

Fig. 5. Experimental results in the startup process and stopping process. (a) Ch1: reactive current; Ch2: compensating current; Ch3: residual current of grid. (b) Ch1: reactive current; Ch2: compensating current; Ch3: residual current of grid.

**CONCLUSION**

This paper has analyzed the fundamentals of STATCOM based on multilevel H-bridge converter with star configuration. And then, the actual H-bridge cascaded STATCOM rated at 10 kV 2 MVA is constructed and the novel control methods are also proposed in detail. The proposed method has the following characteristics.

1) A PBC theory-based nonlinear controller is first used in STATCOM with this cascaded structure for the current loop control, and the viability is verified by the experimental results.

2) The PR controller is designed for overall voltage control and the experimental result proves that it has better performance in terms of response time and damping profile compared with the PI controller.

3) The ADRC is first used in H-bridge cascaded STATCOM for clustered balancing control and the experimental results verify that it can realize excellent dynamic compensation for the outside disturbance.

4) The individual balancing control method which is realized by shifting the modulation wave vertically can be easily implemented in the FPGA.

The experimental results have confirmed that the proposed methods are feasible and effective. In addition, the findings of this study can be extended to the control of any multilevel voltage source converter, especially those with H-bridge cascaded structure.

**REFERENCES**

[1] B. Gultekin and M. Ermis, “Cascaded multilevel converter-based transmission STATCOM: System design methodology and development of a 12 kV *±*12 MVAr power stage,” *IEEE Trans. Power Electron.*, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 4930–4950, Nov. 2013.

[2] B. Gultekin, C. O. Gerc¸ek, T. Atalik, M. Deniz, N. Bic¸er, M. Ermis, K. Kose, C. Ermis, E. Koc¸, I. C¸ adirci, A. Ac¸ik, Y. Akkaya, H. Toygar, and S. Bideci, “Design and implementation of a 154-kV*±*50-Mvar transmission STATCOM based on 21-level cascaded multilevel converter,” *IEEE* *Trans. Ind. Appl.*, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 1030–1045, May/Jun. 2012.

[3] S. Kouro, M. Malinowski, K. Gopakumar, L. G. Franquelo, J. Pou, J. Rodriguez, B.Wu,M. A. Perez, and J. I. Leon, “Recent advances and industrial applications of multilevel converters,” *IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.*, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 2553–2580, Aug. 2010.

[4] F. Z. Peng, J.-S. Lai, J. W. McKeever, and J. VanCoevering, “A multilevel voltage-source inverter with separateDCsources for static var generation,” *IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl.*, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1130–1138, Sep./Oct. 1996.

[5] Y. S. Lai and F. S. Shyu, “Topology for hybrid multilevel inverter,” *Proc. Inst. Elect. Eng.—Elect. Power Appl.*, vol. 149, no. 6, pp. 449–458, Nov. 2002.